CONNECTIVE ADJUSTMENT STRATOSPHERE TREATY

Once upon a time, I crossed the pathway of an aerospace engineer and a flying marshall. I have worked in many domains and consider it a privilege to cross people from various industries. On the one hand, the aerospace engineer redirected his knowledge to become a business development manager travelling the world to advertise aircrafts. On the other hand, the flying marshall is instructed to execute missions at the utmost secrecy. Both have something in common: They deal with the stratosphere equilibrium. Both men have highly volatile professions. I needed a precise assessment from both sides of the equation: The provider of aircrafts and the end-user of the engine.

I asked: «How do activities in the stratosphere impact Earth?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «The thermal equilibrium and radiation waves that occur in the stratosphere eventually move downwards.»

The flying marshall answered: «What goes up must come down. The particles dispatched from aircrafts aim to reach specific positions on Earth.»

I asked: «How do activities in the stratosphere impact humankind?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «If aircrafts misbehave in the atmosphere then it reflects bad decisions made by humankind on Earth to dispatch aircrafts that eventually cause more harm than good.»

The flying marshall answered: «If I strike targets that are approximate not exact positions then it depicts approximate solutions not exact solutions proposed by humankind. The stratosphere is no playground for approximate solutions.»

I asked: «You must see the next question coming, what is your input about the current military offensive in the Arabian Peninsula?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «Total flop. If aircrafts destined for military operations look like sensational fast-action movies or arcades for amateurs then they have not served their purpose.»

The flying marshall answered: «Total flop. I call it random action when I am dispatched as a sniper and need to hit several sites to reach the target. It is a total disaster when a military offensive looks like a video game.»

I asked: «What is your input about a ground offensive in the Arabian Peninsula?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «I am no military expert but if it looks like a cat chasing rats then it has not served its purpose.»

The flying marshall answered: «I do not see how a ground offensive can go right if everything up in the air went wrong. If air snipers left a city in rubbles in a largely dense geographical location then it is highly unlikely that soldiers will succeed in getting through the rubbles. It sounds like a total mess.»

I asked: «What do your recommend to preserve the stratosphere equilibrium?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «The aircraft production line relies on long-term manufacturing processes where pieces are sometimes cannibalized from previous aircrafts. If a cause closes more doors than it opens in 25 years then I need to project how my current decision making process will impact potential better future causes.»

The flying marshall answered: «If dispatching flying snipers exacerbated the problem then other people working on Earth shall gather up to brainstorm solutions that look into the future and instruct air marshalls to stand down.»

I asked: «How do you respond to people who live in peaceful continents and do not feel impacted by battle zones?»

The aerospace engineer answered: «The connective adjustment in the stratosphere depends on all actions pertained by humankind regardless their geographical location. There are 6 continents left, excluding the continent I live in, which is equivalent to 1 + a hand assuming it still has its 5 fingers intact. When a continent is suffering, regardless whether we care or not, has the same impact as suffocating one layer of the atmosphere.»

The aerospace engineer answered: «There are 7 layers in the atmosphere and believing that what goes on elsewhere in the world will never impact us is like living in the clouds and a total disillusion of reality. It is better to wake up now than have the sky eject back particles.»

I answered: «Thanks for a wonderful lesson in connective adjustment of the atmosphere.»